[1]金哲浩,赵震波,姜建芳,等.新近吹填区道路真空预压处理沉降特性[J].浙江水利科技,2017,(04):051-54.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.04.015]
 JIN Zhe-hao,ZHAO Zhen-bo,JIANG Jian-fang,et al.Settlement Characteristics of Newly Constructed Roads with Vacuum Preloading Treatment[J].Zhejiang Hydrotechnics,2017,(04):051-54.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.04.015]
点击复制

新近吹填区道路真空预压处理沉降特性
分享到:

《浙江水利科技》[ISSN:1008-701X/CN:33-1080/TV]

卷:
期数:
2017年04
页码:
051-54
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-07-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
Settlement Characteristics of Newly Constructed Roads with Vacuum Preloading Treatment
作者:
金哲浩1 赵震波2 姜建芳3 汤明礼2
1. 浙江泰阳建设有限公司, 浙江 宁波 315200;
2. 浙江广川工程咨询有限公司, 浙江 杭州 310020;
3. 浙江省水利河口研究院, 浙江 杭州 310020
Author(s):
JIN Zhe-hao1 ZHAO Zhen-bo2 JIANG Jian-fang3 TANG Ming-li2
1. Zhejiang Taiyang Construction Co., Ltd., Hangzhou 315200, Zhejiang, China;
2. Zhejiang Surveying Institute of Estuary and Coast, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, China;
3. Zhejiang Institute of Hydraulics & Estuary, Hangzhou 310020, Zhejiang, China
关键词:
真空预压新近吹填淤泥分层沉降二次处理
Keywords:
vacuum preloadingnew dredger filllayered settlementsecondary processing
分类号:
TV223
DOI:
10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.04.015
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
为满足市政道路工后沉降及高承载力要求,常需对新近吹填淤泥真空预压超软土地基进行二次深层处理。以温州市某吹填淤泥工程为例,分析了深层处理区块一次浅层处理和二次深层处理沉降特征。研究表明,真空预压处理固结沉降随吹填淤泥厚度和插板深度呈一定变化规律,且不同时期存在较大差异性,真空预压深层处理阶段浅层吹填淤泥土固结效果依然明显。
Abstract:
Due to settlement after construction and high bearing capacity requirements of municipal roads,newly dredger filled soft soil foundation with vacuum preloading treatment often need a second deep processing. Taking a dredger fill engineering in Wenzhou as an example,this paper analyzed settlement characteristics of zones with one shallow treatment and second deep treatment. Results suggest that there was a certain variation rule between consolidation settlement with vacuum preloading treatment and depth of flashboard and great differences existed in different periods. The consolidation effects of shallow filled soil were still evident during deep processing period.

参考文献/References:

[1] 董志良,周琦,张功新,等.天津滨海新区浅层超软土加固技术现场对比试验[J].岩土力学,2012(5):1306-1312.
[2] 应舒,高长胜,黄家青.新吹填淤泥地基浅层处理试验研究[J]. 岩土工程学报,2010,32(12):1956-1960.
[3] 唐彤芝,黄家青,关云飞.真空预压加固吹填淤泥土现场试验研究[J].水运工程,2010(4):116-121.
[4] 朱群峰,高长胜,杨守华,等. 超软淤泥地基处理中真空度传递特性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(9):1429-1433.
[5] 詹良通,童军,徐洁.吹填土自重沉积固结特性试验研究[J].水利学报,2008,39(2):201-205.
[6] 颜永国,董志良,杨昌斌. 颗粒级配对真空预压法处理吹填土效果影响试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2011,33(11):1775-1779.
[7] 王艳.真空预压法处理地基的固特性及数值模拟[D].南京河海大学,2007.
[8] 关云飞,唐彤芝,陈海军,等. 超软地基真空预压浅层加固现场试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2011, 33(1):97-101.
[9] 曹永华,李卫,刘天韵.浅层超软土地基真空预压加固技术[J]. 岩土工程学报,2011,33(1):234-238.
[10] 李小梅,唐彤芝,关云飞. 新近吹填淤泥地基加固效果分析[J]. 施工技术,2011,40(355):47-51.
[11] 闫澍旺,朱平,刘润.真空预压法加固软土地基的效果观测分析[J]. 水利学报,2004(3):87-92.
[12] 徐显奇.真空预压法在软基处理工程中的效果分析与评价[J].建筑监督检测与造价,2011,4(5):7-12.
[13] 中华人民共和国行业标准. JTS 147-2-2009真空预压加固软土地基技术规程[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2009.
[14] 凌柏平,龚永康,张建跃.真空预压软基处理分层沉降监测[J]. 水运工程,2010,12(448):129-134.

相似文献/References:

[1]徐永辉,汤明礼,俞炯奇,等.吹填土真空预压工程中孔压计改进埋设方法的研究[J].浙江水利科技,2014,(03):068.
 XU Yong-hui,TANG Ming-li,YU Jiong-qi,et al.Improvement of Laying Pore Water Pressure Gauge for Vacuum Preloading of Dredger Fill[J].Zhejiang Hydrotechnics,2014,(04):068.
[2]洪斌升,丁荣祥,黄林根,等.双曲线与指数曲线模型在真空预压处理地基沉降预测中的应用分析[J].浙江水利科技,2015,(03):061.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2015.03.019]
[3]谢锦波,朱俊易,王贤奔,等.不同排水板型号下真空预压加固吹填软土的试验研究[J].浙江水利科技,2017,(02):060.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.02.017]
 Xie Jin-bo,Zhu Jun-yi,Wang Xian-ben,et al.Experimental Studies of Band Drain Types in Dredged Fill Consolidation with Vacuum Preloading[J].Zhejiang Hydrotechnics,2017,(04):060.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.02.017]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-01-11。
基金项目:浙江省科技计划项目(2016F50003);浙江省水利厅科技计划项目(RC1543);浙江省科技厅公益技术社会发展项目(2015C33059)。
作者简介:金哲浩(1966-),男,高级工程师,大学本科,主要从事水利工程工作。E-mail:jinzhehao2005@sina.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-07-27