[1]牛金林,施国庆,张之平.澜沧江流域大农业安置和逐年补偿安置方式的SWOT分析[J].浙江水利科技,2017,(05):067-71,76.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.05.019]
 NIU Jin-lin,SHI Guo-qing,ZHANG Zhi-ping.SWOT Analysis of Modern Agricultural Mode and Yearly Compensation Modefor Land Resettlementin Lancang River Basin[J].Zhejiang Hydrotechnics,2017,(05):067-71,76.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.05.019]
点击复制

澜沧江流域大农业安置和逐年补偿安置方式的SWOT分析
分享到:

《浙江水利科技》[ISSN:1008-701X/CN:33-1080/TV]

卷:
期数:
2017年05
页码:
067-71,76
栏目:
出版日期:
2017-09-25

文章信息/Info

Title:
SWOT Analysis of Modern Agricultural Mode and Yearly Compensation Modefor Land Resettlementin Lancang River Basin
作者:
牛金林2 施国庆1 张之平2
1. 河海大学, 江苏 南京 210098;
2. 华能澜沧江水电股份有限公司, 云南 昆明 650214
Author(s):
NIU Jin-lin2 SHI Guo-qing1 ZHANG Zhi-ping2
1. Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, China;
2. HuanengLancang River Hydropower Co., Ltd., Kunming 650214, Yunnan, China
关键词:
澜沧江流域水电工程大农业安置逐年补偿安置
Keywords:
LancangRiver Basinhydropower engineeringmodernagricultural resettlementannual compensation resettlement
分类号:
D632.4
DOI:
10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.05.019
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
通过对云南澜沧江流域电站移民安置方式进行调研和综合研究,分析移民政策及云南澜沧江电站移民安置的成功经验和存在问题,以国家现行相关法律法规、政策规定为基础,以澜沧江流域梯级电站为例,基于SWOT模型对大农业安置和逐年补偿安置方式进行了分析。主要得出以下结论:①移民问题涉及到政治、经济、社会、人口、资源、环境诸多因素;②移民安置方式选择时,必须考虑移民安置规划目标、移民环境容量与移民人力资源等因素;③作为1种新型的水电移民安置方式,逐年补偿安置方式在澜沧江流域应用优于大农业安置方式,是澜沧江流域电站移民安置方式的必然选择;④逐年补偿安置方式也存在一些弊端,政策体系还不够完善,操作中的困难还很多。
Abstract:
The investigationand comprehensive research on mode of residents’resettlement were carried out to analyzethe immigration policy,the successful experience and the existing problems of resettlement in Yunnan LancangRiver Basin Hydropower Station. Based on relevant existing laws,regulations,and policy provisions of China,andtakingthe cascade hydropower stations in LancangRiver Basin as an example,this studyadopted SWOT model to analyze agricultural resettlement and the resettlement mode of annual compensation. The main conclusions are as following:①Immigration issuesinvolved political,economic,society,population,resources and environmental factors,etc;②When considering the methods of immigration resettlement,the planning objectives,environmental capacity and the human resources of migration must be taken into consideration;③As a new way of hydropower resettlement,the resettlement mode of annual compensation in LancangRiver Basin was better than that of modern agricultural resettlement way,thusaninevitable choice;④The resettlement mode of annual compensation also had some disadvantages,the policy system had yet to be further improved and there were many difficulties in the operation.

参考文献/References:

[1] 施国庆,孙中艮,周建.水利水电工程移民利益导向机制及其建构初探[J].西北人口, 2009, 30(5):37-41.
[2] 郭万侦,徐静.水电移民逐年货币补偿安置方式优劣分析[C]//中国水利水电顾问集团公司.水电移民政策技术管理论坛论文集. 北京:中国水利水电出版社,2013.
[3] 陈垚森,何艳虎.基于长期补偿的水电工程移民安置实施方案编制研究[J].水力发电,2016(2):7-10.
[4] 杨海青,赵桥,吴金良,等."逐年补偿"为辅的移民安置方式在西南地区的适宜性[J]. 云南水力发电, 2015(1):1-3.
[5] 蒋洪明,朱健.创新怒江水电开发移民安置方式探讨[J].水力发电, 2015, 41(9):60-63.
[6] 杨子生,杨咙霏,刘彦随,等.我国西部水电移民安置的土地资源需求与保障研究——以云南省为例[J].水力发电学报, 2007, 26(2):9-13.
[7] 曾虎,郭万侦.四川省水电工程移民安置与补偿中遇到的新问题和解决方法[J].水电站设计, 2008,24(2):86-89.
[8] 朱东恺.水利水电工程移民制度研究[D].南京:河海大学,2005.
[9] 张万红.澜沧江水电工程移民采取多途径安置方式的实践与思考[J]. 经营管理者, 2015(26):125-126.
[10] 李延歌.基于SWOT模型的学科发展研究[D].南京:河海大学, 2014.

相似文献/References:

[1]牛金林,张之平,施国庆.云南澜沧江流域上游水电工程移民安置方式研究[J].浙江水利科技,2017,(05):008.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.05.003]
 Niu Jin-lin,Zhang Zhi-ping,Shi Guo-qing.Study on Resettlement Approaches of Displaced Persons Caused by Hydropower Projects in the Upper-stream of Lancang River Basin in Yunnan Province[J].Zhejiang Hydrotechnics,2017,(05):008.[doi:10.13641/j.cnki.33-1162/tv.2017.05.003]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2017-01-15。
作者简介:牛金林(1982-),男,工程师,硕士,主要从事工程移民研究工作。E-mail:niujinlin2008@qq.com
更新日期/Last Update: 2017-09-28